โš–๏ธ Complete Index

Logical Fallacies Index

Master the art of identifying flawed reasoning. These common errors in logic can derail productive discussions and lead to poor decisions. Learn to spot them in debates, media, and everyday conversations.

Understanding Logical Fallacies

A logical fallacy is a flaw in reasoning that renders an argument invalid or unsound. Unlike cognitive biases, which are systematic errors in thinking, logical fallacies are specific mistakes in the structure or content of arguments.

These fallacies can be committed intentionally (to mislead) or unintentionally (due to poor reasoning skills). Understanding them helps you become a better critical thinker and more effective communicator.

Available Logical Fallacies

๐ŸŽฏ Fallacies of Relevance

These fallacies introduce irrelevant information that distracts from the real issue.

Straw Man Fallacy

Misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack, then arguing against this distorted version.

Difficulty: Easy to Moderate Frequency: Very Common

Ad Hominem

Attacking the person making an argument rather than addressing the argument itself.

Difficulty: Easy Frequency: Very Common

โšก Fallacies of Insufficient Evidence

These fallacies occur when conclusions are drawn from inadequate or inappropriate evidence.

False Dilemma

Presenting only two options when more alternatives exist, forcing a choice between extremes.

Difficulty: Moderate Frequency: Common

Slippery Slope

Claiming that one event will inevitably lead to a chain of negative consequences without evidence.

Difficulty: Moderate Frequency: Common

Appeal to Authority

Accepting claims as true simply because an authority figure made them, regardless of their expertise in the specific area.

Difficulty: Moderate Frequency: Very Common

Bandwagon Fallacy

Believing something is true or right just because many other people believe it or are doing it.

Difficulty: Easy to Moderate Frequency: Extremely Common

Coming Soon

We're continuously expanding our collection of logical fallacies. Future additions will include:

  • Circular Reasoning - Using the conclusion as one of the premises
  • Red Herring - Introducing irrelevant information to distract from the main issue
  • Appeal to Emotion - Using emotional manipulation instead of logical reasoning
  • Hasty Generalization - Drawing broad conclusions from limited examples

How to Identify Fallacies

๐ŸŽฏ

Focus on Structure

Look at how the argument is constructed. Does the conclusion follow logically from the premises?

๐Ÿ”

Check Relevance

Ask whether the evidence presented actually supports the conclusion being made.

โš–๏ธ

Look for Missing Information

Consider what information might be missing or what alternative explanations exist.

๐Ÿง 

Practice with Examples

Use our interactive tools to practice recognizing fallacies in realistic scenarios.